How to translate text using browser tools
1 September 2005 Small Mammal Use of Suburban and Urban Parks in Central Pennsylvania
Caroyln G. Mahan, Timothy J. O'Connell
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

To assist land managers responsible for park management, we conducted a pilot study to examine small mammal assemblages at 7 riparian parks in suburban/ urban landscapes and at 1 riparian site in mature forest, all located in central Pennsylvania. Species richness and diversity were lowest in parks containing manicured habitats and surrounded by human-modified landscapes. However, parks managed for passive recreation supported mammalian assemblages that were similar in richness and diversity to our mature riparian forest site. The mature riparian forest site contained four species of small mammals (eastern chipmunks [Tamias striatus], white-footed mice [Peromyscus leucopus], deer mice [P. maniculatus], and woodland jumping mice [Napeozapus insignis]), and Spring Creek Nature Park, a park managed to promote natural and native habitats, contained five species (short-tailed shrews [Blarina brevicauda], eastern chipmunks, white-footed mice, meadow voles [Microtus pennsylvanicus], and meadow jumping mice [Zapus hudsonius]). In contrast, parks located in more urban settings and consisting primarily of mowed habitat contained only 1 or 2 species of small mammals. We did not capture non-native species in our study. Based upon this study, we recommend locating parks along streams or other natural corridors, leaving unmowed 10–15-m buffers along streams, and planting native trees along stream corridors in order to encourage diversity of small mammals in suburban and urban parks.

Caroyln G. Mahan and Timothy J. O'Connell "Small Mammal Use of Suburban and Urban Parks in Central Pennsylvania," Northeastern Naturalist 12(3), 307-314, (1 September 2005). https://doi.org/10.1656/1092-6194(2005)012[0307:SMUOSA]2.0.CO;2
Published: 1 September 2005
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission
Back to Top